eBay chatboard archive: Feb-05-07 to Feb-11-07 week

Posted by matthew1999   ( 148 ) on Feb-11-07 at 23:08:53 PST   Listings
Hello all,

Thanks for your hello's. I haven't been here much in recent months because of lack of time, but I think about you all and hope to come back in the summer when my courses are done for the year and my book will finally be finished. Heck, I didn't even get to the midtown stamp show on 57th Street this past weekend...

Jim, interesting about the B&M and wartime Slovakia issues showing Palanok. Since presumably Hungary had grabbed Carpatho-Ukraine by then, I wonder what political subtext or foreign-affairs significance those issues had...

Bjorn, you're right! Though I'm sure the new nation of C-U was not widely recognized during its existence...

Mh
Posted by bjornmu   ( 878 ) on Feb-11-07 at 23:06:04 PST   Listings
Saving HTML pages: I've been doing that almost since the beginning. I always save the pages and the images (not always all images) of items I consider, and keep all that I win.

It used to be because I had a slow ISDN line at home, and instead of spening time online (which was slow and cost by the minute), I browsed eBay at work before going home, saved interesting items, then sent these in "bulk" to my home computer where I could study them off-line. After I got broadband and didn't have to worry, I still continued the practice.

I must have saved thousands of pages in Netscape, later Mozilla and never had a problem. I think Internet Expoder tries to create a "complete" page by including everything it references, including images, instead of just saving the HTML itself. Maybe this is configurable?

I also never have a problem saving the images. Firefox probably works quite similar to Mozilla.
Posted by mini*lindy   ( 317 ) on Feb-11-07 at 21:58:46 PST   Listings
PeterC not allowed, and downright misleading. That seller should be reported.
Posted by jaywild   ( 917 ) on Feb-11-07 at 21:27:17 PST   Listings
figmente… Aha—I thought it was only me that was having trouble with the “back button” on the browser. I downloaded ie7 some time ago, and only recently began having that problem. It can be very irritating…

Bob in WA… My Scott #4 is a proof. I don’t have a copy of either the #2 or the #4 regular issue. I see them frequently on eBay and the nice ones always command very high prices.

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by peterc8888   ( 299 ) on Feb-11-07 at 21:13:06 PST   Listings
Is this allowed to do?

Ok or not


PC
Posted by mini*lindy   ( 317 ) on Feb-11-07 at 21:12:24 PST   Listings
Bob in WA that new ruling on privacy was on the eBay announcements page a month or 2 ago. Apart from now not being able to check possible shill bidding, I like to check out my Bidders to see what else they are bidding on, especially those with, say less than 10 feedbacks, and if it is an expensive item, to see if they are perhaps just having a 'fun day' bidding on dozens of items. All around NOT a good move on eBays part, but I think its here to stay!!
Linda
Posted by stamphick!   ( 334 ) on Feb-11-07 at 20:38:17 PST   Listings
Bob in WA...I have no problem saving pages using Firefox 2.0.
Posted by rclwa   ( 955 ) on Feb-11-07 at 20:28:55 PST   Listings
bilbo -- I hadn't realized one can no longer save pages. As some have suggested, perhaps it varies with browser used. Hopefully it isn't permanent. I have frequently saved entire pages for future reference, since the darn things can only be searched back 30 days, and are completely gone after 90 days, even if you kept the number or a bookmark, not to mention sellers who delete or reassign images soon after auction end. It has also been a sneaky way to obtain an image that has those ''sorry this is our property'' pop-ups when you try to save it. I just save the whole auction page, then find the jpg image in the file. After re-saving the image, I can delete the rest. A bit of a nuisance, but I figured if I could see it on my screen, there had to be a way to save it. There's probably a simpler way, but I was proud of myself for even figuring out that much.

I did notice another change, with bidding history. Now they are starting to switch to private auctions when they finish! I don't understand completely--it applies to some auctions and not others, and I can't figure out the criteria for which are thus affected. But at the end they just say ''Bidder 1, Bidder 2, etc'' and there is no way to obtain the useful information that previously helped guide one's bidding. For example it is often useful to check the feedback of a rival bidder, then in turn click on a few lots he previously won and check the bid history to see if he just bids high and early, or uses sniping or back up bids. Now you can't check his feedback because he is anonymous. And when it is ongoing, as some also are, it is especially annoying. For example, I have friendly competition with one or two others on similar items, and we often defer to each other when we see a bid already placed. I'd hate to outbid or run up a friend I would ordinarily let have it. Of course such courtesy is probably anathema to eBay, who may gleefully see friendships ruined if it means an extra nickel in their coffers.

And just yesterday I discovered they do this at auction end, that is, the auction will show the actual bidders while it is still ongoing, but apparently at the instant it ends, except for seller and winner, all the bidders become anonymous! What's with that? Looks like it could introduce a whole new sniping practice, to capture the auction page with just 2 or 3 seconds to go, in order to save the bidding history before they are all masked! Again, I have no idea how prevalent this practice will become, or if it (hopefully) is another of those weird experiments that eBay seems to do for a while and then they go away. But I observed it definitely take place on a recent auction, in which the bidders IDs were available while it was going, then were masked when it finished. And it was a US auction, not like in Germany with their extra privacy rules or anything. Anybody know more about this?

Bjorn -- Yes, that's a bona fide Dangit!--almost a triple one! Minimum bid was one raise over 16.09 when you bid 46.13 and lost!

dcderoo -- Yes, Jaywild posted that design (the reprint, I believe) just before 9 AM. Both his and yours are nice uncancelled 4-margin copies. That's a scarce item in a #2. That was the first thing I thought of for X, too. Mine's a used 3-margin, cut in pretty heavily at one corner. But at least Dad had filled the space!

Gee, I figure Matt in Ohio must have some nice Xenia covers!

Bob in WA
Posted by due2cents   ( 24 ) on Feb-11-07 at 20:06:07 PST   Listings
I-O

and Anyone with Japanese interest

I do not know what exactly these would be called and while I normally prefer just standard mail real regular
stuck on envelopes and card stuff , I found these whatevers with the Little Beautiful engravings just amazing and wonderous things to look at
nippon1969

also for I-O anything in the series like FDCIamguessing This you need scans of.

I have a few boxes sitting here just full of them have not checked the cat yet but it seems quite a run
Posted by 22028   ( 1554 ) on Feb-11-07 at 19:59:54 PST   Listings
mini*lindy, the item itself is only 4 x 6 cm large or so..., A4 ,is way to large....
Here is the image...
http://www.statusint.com/photo/2842.jpg
Guess I will send a mail to the auction house.
Posted by mini*lindy   ( 317 ) on Feb-11-07 at 19:55:28 PST   Listings
Rainer, a large (A4) size Registered Envelope from here to UAR is $A17.00 plus the auction house would add something for packing charges, and charge a % to cover insurance. so that sounds about right. If it is a smaller piece, and would fit into a long envelope, 13x24cm then that envelope costs A$10.50

Linda
Posted by 22028   ( 1554 ) on Feb-11-07 at 19:45:31 PST   Listings
What are shipping costs from Australia to United Arab Emirates? I just have received an invoice from an auction house, they like to charge Aus-$ 20 shipping plus Aus-$ 4.17 insurance. Sounds high for me, considering the fact that only a small fragment with 2 stamps are to be shipped.
Posted by postalhysteria   ( 3387 ) on Feb-11-07 at 19:35:57 PST   Listings

Xis for taXi taX stamps

I am X-tatic!

I sure hope D did it right this time

Posted by figmente   ( 876 ) on Feb-11-07 at 19:01:53 PST   Listings
I think back button misbehavior comes with ie7.
Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 18:47:34 PST   Listings
NOIP… Huh??

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by duncan_doenitz   ( 110 ) on Feb-11-07 at 18:18:50 PST   Listings
Matt in AZ, I really don't know the answer to your question about visible clues in the paper, and actually it has not been an issue so far in identifying the early and late printings. They do vary a bit in dimensions, but so far none have been difficult to identify, they sort into one or the other category without difficulty.

A few things work as safety checks to be sure none are falsely identified, because 1) the plate numbers of the 1928 printings are known, and a wrong plate number that matches the 1928 printings would be a clue that the methodology is wrong. 2) Same for the color. The #563's in particular vary widely in color, and any of the bluer colors have consistently been from the early print runs. They can't be totally sorted by color and plate number though because, for example, the green #563's were on both types of paper. 3) Stamps on dated covers also support the fact that these stamps did not appear until the 1928 print runs. 4) Records tell us when the surplus paper was used, so that is also documented, as was the background story of the horizontal grained paper's history.

I really should study these more thoroughly though. Meanwhile, they really are easy to identify once you have both types in hand. And they can usually be picked out in an eBay auction scan if multiple stamps are shown together, that's how I obtain most of mine.

-Dunc
Posted by gunnysgt77   ( 543 ) on Feb-11-07 at 18:00:31 PST   Listings
Good evening all.... Could anyone tell me if there are any "rare" 1933 Graf Zeppelin Flight covers from the Century of Progress Expo. I have a group of 4 with a single C18 on 2 and a pair of C18's on the other two that came and went from Friedrichshafen,Germany...Thank you.
Posted by dcderoo   ( 1649 ) on Feb-11-07 at 18:00:27 PST   Listings
Has anyone used this for their "X" entry?

US Scott# 2

Posted by thebriguy1   ( 64 ) on Feb-11-07 at 17:21:23 PST   Listings
keleofa The issue on the flat/rotary Washington/Franklins is one of printing technology. The one Dunc was illustrating on the 4th bureau series, involves the paper.

Being frugal and using the left over paper designed for booklet panes (with the natural grain running 90 degrees different), has led to two identifible types of each catalog # of stamp. His linked pics are a perfect display. You are correct though, depending on the humidity content of the stock when imprinted, the difference.....can differ!

PS...Excellent choice of trays. I've bought commercial watermarking trays, and I've discarded them. Absolutely the BEST one i've ever encountered, is a shallow black glass ash try I "liberated" from my local watering hole. :o)
Posted by due2cents   ( 24 ) on Feb-11-07 at 17:16:45 PST   Listings
Am starting my research on some of the material
can Anyone Tell me why so few Match and medicine stamps listed, I see s few in stores or listings
anyone know if they will sell or not here?
Posted by jim_lawler   ( 1221 ) on Feb-11-07 at 17:09:59 PST   Listings
In keeping with the "X" theme here’s a cover from a friends collection and his remarks about the next few I’ll be posting.

The American Postal Machines Company installed their first flag cancel machine in Boston in October 1894, followed by installations in Chicago and Washington, DC in December. This Chicago machine with an “X” in the die space was placed into use in 1895 and used into 1896 before the killer portion was replaced with the halyard-style flag. To differentiate machines, Chicago used the entire alphabet in the die spaces as well as the numbers up to 39 in their early installations.

The Time Marking Machine Company of Chicago, Illinois installed many of their machines close to home. This included many short runs and experiments in Chicago. Among the scarcer Chicago machine cancels are those with the letters L, U, V, W, X, and XX in the die space in the killer bars. Most of these die space letters ran only a few days to (at most) 3 and a half months. This use was often in December - perhaps to keep up with the holiday mail rush? The “X” die space variety ran during at least 5 short time periods in 1909-1911, with this run lasting almost 8 weeks through most of November and December 1910. The “XX” die space variety ran during 4 short time periods in 1910-1912, with this run lasting almost 3 weeks from late November to mid-December 1910.September 10, 1985.

Jim L.
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 16:04:14 PST   Listings
Switch weather map to visible and use satellite image on google.
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 16:03:04 PST   Listings
Watermark
Trays


Matt in Arizona
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 15:59:47 PST   Listings
Jeff

Sorry for slow reply but we have been BBQing most of the afternoon.

As far as weather map goes not much.

As far as google Earth goes this might be better.
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 15:48:44 PST   Listings
Dunc,

re: USA 1922-25 Regular Issues

I have read your postings on RF's Board regarding these printings. I haven't been collecting much US in the way of stamps, mostly postal history. At the Riverside show I looked through some more modern postal history, including Liberty Series usages. But I do have accumulations of US off paper that one day I'll tackle.

Is everything about the later printing the same except it was done on paper that may shrink a little more? Is this shrinkage constant? There is a physical difference in the Washington-Franklins between Flat Plate and Rotary printings. I guess what I am asking is if the amount of shrinkage is negligible can identification be made by examining the paper?

Matt in Arizona
Posted by thebriguy1   ( 64 ) on Feb-11-07 at 15:23:04 PST   Listings
Junkrat I see nobody tackled the question yet, so here gos. A "watermark" is a design in the paper created when the paper was made. If you hold up a new US currency bill, you'll see the ghoat like image of the portrait,...that is a watermark. Like modern currency, many stamps of old were printed on watermarked paper as a security measure (to foil counterfeiters).

The way to see a stamps watermark is place it on a flat black surface, and drench it with a solvent (like ronsonol lighter fluid)....if the paper it was printed is watermarked, the watermark areas will show up as black.

This sounds harsh, but the solvents evaporate away,
leaving the stamp none worse for wear.

Probably NOT a good idea to be smoking when you do this though......
Posted by grannygee   ( 388 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:53:29 PST   Listings
Infla-alec
Thanks for lettin me know and I will try not to make to many mistakes. grannygee
Posted by duncan_doenitz   ( 110 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:42:26 PST   Listings
Matt in AZ, I don't know the percentages on the 1928 printings, even though I collect them I haven't done much proper research. Honestly I've mostly just been searching for them on eBay, and so far I haven't found a #567 variety yet, although I've bought a few that turned out to be the regular issue. So in the case of #567's I'd say the odds are slim. The mintage figures are in the new Durland Catalog, which I don't have yet.

The stamps involved are perf 11 varieties #563 11c Hayes, #564 12c Cleveland, #566 15c Statue of Liberty, #567 your 20c Golden Gate, #568 25c Niagara Falls, and #569 30c Buffalo. Two more printed on booklet paper in 1928 were the #C11 Air Mail Beacon and #E13 Special Delivery.

I do know that the #563 is the easiest to find, about half of the 1928 run was on booklet paper. The toughtest one is the #E13 but I've managed to find a couple of them.

Even though they are not yet listed in Scott, the APS will certify the variety.

-Dunc
Posted by librarian-c   ( 951 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:36:19 PST   Listings
Thank you. At least I'll be able to sleep tonight..........

I just found an envelope with a mix of both types of watermarks on the same 3 issues and started to feel my eye twitch.....

Much appreciated!!

John A
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:34:25 PST   Listings
John Yes!
Posted by librarian-c   ( 951 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:33:03 PST   Listings
Posted by greenwave4u ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:22:11 PST Listings
Librarian The watermark is side to side, in other words the crown is lying on its side. 389 to 393 are all what you call horizontal, i.e. long side at the top and bottom:-)
Peter


Thank you Peter. Now I may appear thick here, but I want to clarify what the proper watermark should be:

If I am looking at the watermark on the horizontal stamp, from the back, with the design in the appropriate direction (long side top and bottom) the crown should be on its side and the script is also sideways(running top to bottom)....so to read the script properly, I would have to turn the stamp so that it is vertical (short side top and bottom)?

Is that correct? It's not a value thing here, just that I seemed to have lost my mind with this!!

Thanks again.

John A
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:26:23 PST   Listings
the junkrut This is more of a posting board where members come and go. I am sure someone will give you better advice than me just keep checking back over the next couple of hours
Posted by dbenson   ( 7835 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:25:55 PST   Listings
X is for ?,

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r256/deebee444/x.jpg

David B.
Posted by dbenson   ( 7835 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:25:00 PST   Listings
Librarian, the direction of the watermark is in relationship to the design of the stamp. Some of the values exist with either upright or sideways watermarks.

David B.
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:24:53 PST   Listings
The upright variety are oin the others in that series with the short side top and bottom if that makes sense:-)
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:22:11 PST   Listings
Librarian The watermark is side to side, in other words the crown is lying on its side. 389 to 393 are all what you call horizontal, i.e. long side at the top and bottom:-)
Peter
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:16:39 PST   Listings
What is a water mark? I found this stamp. now I wonder if it has a water mark.
Posted by librarian-c   ( 951 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:14:36 PST   Listings
Need help with a (possibly) silly problem:

I am looking at stamps of Ceylon - KGVI - and trying to figure out which direction the watermark is supposed to be on the horizontal stamps???

Stanley Gibbons list several issues (SG#389-393, SC#281-85) with the watermark upright. If I am viewing these stamps with the design horizontally, should the regular watermark be side-to-side or up-and-down??......which would make the watermark upright variety .......??

As always, I appreciate any assistance you can offer.

John A
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:13:55 PST   Listings
Any one out there???LOL
Posted by chipg   ( 208 ) on Feb-11-07 at 14:03:10 PST   Listings
Judgement Day for the W's

First of all, thanks for posting so many interesting items. Here are some of the things that struck me as especially interesting during the week (but please don't read that as the other stuff was uniteresting):

Jaywild posted a page of W..., Arizona precancels. I noted that each was on a different stamp. That little extra touch was nice.

Mini*lindy shared the story of Wilcox the Welldigger. Nice.

Mikedak posted some Whitehead machine cancellations (lost the link). I've never even heard of Whitehead machine cancellations. Thanks for expanding my knowledge a bit.

Jim_Lawler showed a West Lafayetts provisional precancel. Although he didn't say so, I'll bet that he found it unidentified in some lot or box. If you know what you're looking for, you can make finds everyday.

So, the choice of "winner came down to two posts which I will describe in no particular order:

The first finalist, Knuden put up a set of links to Wrappers with Contents. Circulars and wrappers are so often considered as tranistory information by the recipients. To find such items with their original contents is really something special.

The second finalist, Knuden posted a link to a truly world-class exhibit of Danish Wrappers. As mentioned earlier, such items are so ephemeral that it is quite a feat to assemble anything that could be considered as a "complete" showing. I still remember seeing one other such exhibit of GB wrappers. Anyone who collect such an area, and who does it so well, must lead a blessed life.

So, with out any further deliberation, the winner of the "W" round is .....Knuden (it was a tie).

Congratulations to all.

So, hopefully we can have a troll-free week and on to X.

Chip
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:53:50 PST   Listings
PETER! I would have no Idea how to post a pic. in here.
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:52:14 PST   Listings
any info on a Woodrow wilson *1913-1921* $ stamp??
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:52:07 PST   Listings
Jthejunkrut If you are able to post a link to a scan or picture onto this board someone here should be able to help you. You can also scroll down to the yellow pages and there you will find plenty of links to help the beginner and also how to post a link.

cheers

Peter
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:47:26 PST   Listings
did e-one leave?????
Posted by thejunkrut   ( 25 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:44:46 PST   Listings
HI I'm new at this. anyone know how I find the value on a stamp that I found in a box that my dad had & I think it may have been from his parents. I have no idea where to go with this? thank you *Jackie*
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:15:25 PST   Listings
Dunc,

Thanks! It is my cover and I compared it to my other 567s -- all appear to be the same size. What is the ratio of the original printing to the later printing?

Matt in Arizona
Posted by 19thcentpostal   ( 151 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:12:10 PST   Listings
Infla-alec
Thank you for responding to my question at Feb-10-07 22:10:52. If anyone else can add more I would very much appreciate it.
Lynn
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:03:32 PST   Listings
Interesting if you do a google fight between the 2, xiong mao wins by only 1,000
Posted by mini*lindy   ( 317 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:02:38 PST   Listings
X is for... well I decided to look in my ancient copy of Philatelic Terms Illustrated, a 1970s edition from Stanley Gibbons, and yes there is one entry for X

Xylography. The art of engraving on wood. Some stamps of Victoria, 1854-59 were true woodblocks, individually engraved to form a plate of 50 impressions. For the 'Registration' and 'Too Late' stamps, separate stereotyped plates for the secondary colours augmented the woodblocks, while in the 'Emblems' issue electrotyped plates were made from woodblock 'dies'.
So there you have it...X is for Woodblocks!

Linda
:o)

Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 13:00:28 PST   Listings
Jim Far be it for me to argue with my wife who is a Beijing ren but she maintains that mao xiong is the Taiwan version!
Posted by postalhysteria   ( 3387 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:54:35 PST   Listings

IO Re Wildwood Naturists resort, can you link to a satellite image, I want to see what kind of "weather" they are having!

AZ Matt I know what you mean, my wife sometimes thinks I am good looking.

BTW, got the 2 cards just fine. Thanks

Posted by duncan_doenitz   ( 110 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:50:35 PST   Listings
Matt in AZ,

Do you own the cover with the solo #567 20 cent stamp? If you do, there is a quick comparison you can make to determine if the stamp was added later - I only mention it because a measurement of the scanned stamp suggests that it might be a later printing of #567.

In 1928 a printing run was done on left over paper, paper that was originally made for printing booklet stamps. That paper intentionally had grain that ran horizontally, instead of the normal vertical grain.

Because printing of stamps was done on damp paper, there was shrinkage after printing (remember the Seinfeld episode, George and shrinkage?!) and shrinkage was less in the direction of the paper grain. As a result, the stamps printed on booklet paper were wider and shorter than the earlier printings of the same stamps.

Compare other examples of #567 to yours and you might see a difference. I measured a difference on the computer, but unfortunately "you can't tell anything from a scan". Seriously, the image might be a little distorted so the only way to tell for sure is by actual comparison.

The same comparison can be seen by looking at #563, which was printed on both papers and often the greener examples are on booklet paper so it's a bit easier to find both sizes. Here's what to look for...

peewee

Pay no attention to the perfs or the white paper, just compare the printed image size. Then compare the opposite dimension. A 1928 printing will be shorter and wider.

To confuse things a little, the 20 cent stamp would've been printed sideways in comparison to the #563, but that just means that in 1928 the "long" dimension on the stamps would be shorter, and the narrow dimension wider.

You probably didn't expect such a weird answer, but anyway the 1928 printing is a little-known topic. They are NOT listed in the US Scott Specialized catalog yet, but they are noted in the latest Durland Plate Number Catalog.

Collecting them is really a lot like collecting the rotary plate examples of stamps vs flat plate counterparts. The plates being wrapped - stretched - around a curved rotary press drum changed the size of the printed stamps.

That's my story and I'm "sticking" to it.

-Dunc
Posted by knuden   ( 2202 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:41:42 PST   Listings
Try again.

And Mao Zedong is Mao Zedong. *lol*

K.E   I'm a silly little man - whoopee!!

Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:30:43 PST   Listings
Peter

To be more pedantic, Xiong mao is a tomcat, Mao xiong is a panda.
Posted by twicetied   ( 229 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:26:53 PST   Listings


</body>
Let's try this again and hope it works....

Morning/Evening Everyone,



I also was able to get to the APS Show this weekend and thought I would stop by on the way back to the balcony.




Matt , Congradulations on your Gold, I wish the lighting had been a little better for my aging eyes.




I was able to add to my collection with a couple of items I've been wanting..... New Goodies
.








Show seemed very busy when I was there, dealers were doing at least some biz.

I was only able to stay for four hours since my wife was with me, wanted to curtail my spending, and she just had her knee operated on last month.

I kept trying to get her to stay home, "since it would be hard on her knee"; but anytime I get near a stamp show or gun show, she starts getting "real nervous".

She wanted to be there to protect our retirement funds.


Everyone have a fine day,

John
Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:23:22 PST   Listings
twicetied… No need to feel bad. Everyone misses the mark in html sooner or later, including yours truly.

The text on this postcard reads—

”I know a party who holds about $1000 worth of US Two Dollar ($2) Columbian stamps unused o.g. in very fine condition – To close at once, can get all or any part for you if unsold, at ($2.25 each). If you can use same, let me have a prompt answer.”
Well, that’s not a bad offer, all-you-can-eat MOG $2 Columbians at 25¢ over face. I wonder if the offer is still good. Only 111 years have elapsed since it was made…

J

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by twicetied   ( 229 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:13:06 PST   Listings
Thanks Jim, Will be a bit more careful in the future.

John
Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:12:08 PST   Listings
twicetied… Very nice items, by the way. Your imperf Lincolns show the “tiny eye” effect very well (see my link below).

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:10:20 PST   Listings
twicetied… Here is your link.

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by twicetied   ( 229 ) on Feb-11-07 at 12:06:23 PST   Listings
Sorry, that didn't work well at all. I've reported myself. John
Posted by greenwave4u   ( 71 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:59:58 PST   Listings
X Marks the spot. In the English language speaking countries not a very popular letter but I am sure there must be many from Spanish and Italian speaking countries? For my contribution I will follow Jim's line of thought there are plenty of X's in China but mine are more visually obvious. First being Xiang which in translated Elephant. In this case the stamp depicts 20 years of diplomatic relations with Thailand issued in 1995. The second a bit more convoluted, what do you get if you cross a bear with a cat? A panda of course! The Chinese for bear is xiong and the Chinese for cat is mao; the Chinese for panda is xiong mao


cheers

Peter
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:47:00 PST   Listings
Mitchell & Matthew

Dagnab it. I see that the Palanok Castle also exists on the stamps of Bohemia and Moravia (Scott 11) and Slovakia (Scott 13).
Posted by infla-alec   ( 506 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:42:35 PST   Listings
Granny You simply used the wrong HTML code when trying to place the image as a link.
If unsure how it would look in advance of posting here simply copy and paste the image URL from your web host here. Image URL will always start with http and not have any HTML code in front of it.
My post below I reported and it will be removed as will yours with images be if you repory your own posting. To do so simply click on the little "report" button in your message.
The point being don't be afraid to come here and make mistakes.
Posted by grannygee   ( 388 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:33:43 PST   Listings
HI Thanks for the information. I will try link next time. grannygee
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:29:03 PST   Listings
Granny,

Your stamp is actually Scott #212. In mint (not used, not postmarked, with gum on back adn well centered) is valued at $120, or used at $2.25. Did you have other questions? It's a fairly common stamp.

As to your images, since some are on slower dial up internet connections we've developed a local etiquette not to post images directly here but just post a link. No worries, just delete the (or name change) file saved on Photobucket.

Matt in Arizona
Posted by malolo   ( 836 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:19:30 PST   Listings
Aloha from Port Townsend, WA -

Checking in for a short read. When is eBay going to get the picture that fakes are fakes and have little collectable value?

Local weather here in northern Washington has changed dramatically. After forecasts of cold and wet, we have sunshine and blue sky, can only be attributed to Hawaii coming to Washington.

Roger

Roger
Posted by grannygee   ( 388 ) on Feb-11-07 at 11:01:54 PST   Listings
Did I do something wrong by placing pictures? I see there are no other pictures showing. Please let me know. Granny
Posted by grannygee   ( 388 ) on Feb-11-07 at 10:53:48 PST   Listings
Hi I have a stamp that I would like some help with. Hinged in book as 214 new design blue Franklin any ifo appreciated.Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 09:58:36 PST   Listings
grannygee

If you go to the big yellow box below, there is a link to "how to post a link".
Posted by grannygee   ( 388 ) on Feb-11-07 at 09:49:48 PST   Listings
Hi can anyone trell me how to get pictures from photobucket to this site. grannygee
Posted by saphilatelics   ( 409 ) on Feb-11-07 at 09:49:29 PST   Listings
knuden, dcderoo

Both the Wuerttemberg Michel 1 and 4 are found in 3 Types (I-III). They are not listed in Michel (they are noted, but not catalogued, as there is no difference in value), but they can be found in the specialized literature. Serious Wuerttemberg collectors do collect them, and BPP experts will identify and sign them. So they are very much "real", even if they are not in Michel. The stamp dcderoo showed the other day was a Type II (it was me who identified all those stamps for him).
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 09:21:04 PST   Listings
Jim,

re: AR Cover. Good points.

When I was looking over the cover the Expo label caught my eye, but then my brain kicked in and I saw no reason for a 1901 label to be on a 1926 cover. But yes, if it was purely philatelic it would be prettier.

Matt in Arizona
Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 09:13:10 PST   Listings
A town in Wales, perhaps?

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by jaywild   ( 916 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:56:04 PST   Listings
X… Is for—X cents, of course!

No Arizona towns begin with X, so no chance for a precancel.

Speaking of Arizona, Matt in AZ your cover looks OK to me, not philatelic either. Who knows why the label was applied? Perhaps the sender and receiver both went to the expo in olden days. If the cover had been a contrivance there would have been more effort at a balanced appearance (not to mention neater writing) and I doubt the stamp would have been upside down and placed crookedly. The sender took the letter to the PO and the clerk determined the rate then slapped on the stamp willy-nilly and canceled it. It seems to me a contriver would have asked (at least) to apply the stamp himself.

Jim

? How to do a “flip-comparison” test on perforations
? US Stamp Identifiers:
| 10c Issue of 1855-57 | First 3¢ Stamped Envelopes | Grilled Stamps | Large “Banknotes” | First Bureau Issues | Abe Lincoln’s “tiny eye”
                                    | Washington-Franklin stamps of 1908-22 | 2nd & 3rd Issue Revenue Designs | Colors, Scott 70/78, 24¢ Washington

Posted by bjornmu   ( 875 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:50:10 PST   Listings
NOIP: is this a proper Dangit! or was the winning bid too "new"? I did see it before placing my snipe bid. This stamp would normally be worth 10 Euros max due to very thin margins, but it has a partial French 12 decimes postage due cancel.
Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:33:39 PST   Listings
Iomoon & Jeff - OK, thanks!

Jeff - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder! :-)

Matt in Arizona
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:33:24 PST   Listings
Jeff

At 10:30am here, it's already in the mid 60's F.
I see your local weather station is at Wildwood Naturists resort.
I have a gut feeling that they are fully clothed at the moment.
Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:24:44 PST   Listings
Matt in Arizona

Looks good to me!


Hmmm, the only area with a X listed in Scott is Xeimappa.
I can't think up a crossword clue!
Posted by postalhysteria   ( 3387 ) on Feb-11-07 at 08:22:26 PST   Listings

IO I'll take 42 over some of our recent weather.
Corned beef was great, it went great with a big heaping portion of couch potato
Still too cool for me to fire up the smoker

AZ Matt I don't see anything wrong with the 20c AR cover except that it isn't particularly attractive.

Jeff

Posted by keleofa   ( 3368 ) on Feb-11-07 at 07:40:12 PST   Listings
Handstamps....

1926 Solo use of 20¢
Golden Gate (Scott 567)


At the Riverside show I was going through a lot of 20th century covers and came across the illustrated cover. I examined it for a couple of minutes, wondering if the handstamps were real. For some reason I am now even more skeptical of hand stamps...

Anyway, the cover is probably philatelic due to the 1901 Pan Am Expo label on the back. It is posted from Los Angeles to Ravenna, Ohio in March 1926.

20c would break down as follows:

2c 1st class domestic postage
3c Return Receipt Fee (in effect 15 April 1925)
15 Registration Fee, up to $50 insured (in effect 15 April 1925)

AR - Avis de Reception Handstamp (close up)

I am looking for comments regarding this cover. Are the Los Angeles postal markings on the front good? It does appear to have been carried through the mails and the Los Angeles registration markings on the back look real, as does the Ravenna receiving marking.

Opinions?

TIA,

Matt in Arizona
Posted by duncan_doenitz   ( 110 ) on Feb-11-07 at 07:39:03 PST   Listings
Congratulations on your find, bilbo! And it's nice that you connected with Vic, so the sheet ended up with a good guy.

About searching on eBay - depending on your browser, you might have to RIGHT click on links, then select to open it in a separate window. Anyway, the idea is to keep your search page active, so you don't have to navigate back to it. That way you can just close the auction item page, no further loading is necessary.

About saving eBay pages - that's always been a bit ragged, it seems. For stuff I want to be absolutely sure about, I take a screen capture of the page, which means that the links don't work but the screen image is preserved.

In order to get something as large as an eBay auction image, I use Hypersnap. I'm... um... frugal. Yeah, that's it, frugal. So I use the free version of Hypersnap, which adds Hypersnap logos to the captured image, but for a minimal charge you can get a version that yields a clean image without the annoying blurb.

Once Hypersnap is loaded, all that is required is to 1) open the program, 2) get the eBay auction on screen, 3) hit Ctrl+Shift+W, then hit Enter, and Hypersnap scrolls down, capturing the entire window. Save as usual.

And for the balconeers...

You can capture individual auction images (the "photos") by right clicking on the image and selecting Save Photo As... or you can do a screen shot by hitting Print Screen, then opening Paint (Start > Programs > Accessories > Paint), then from the pull down menu select Edit and Paste. That's with a desktop computer. The screen shot command for a laptop I'm not sure about, I think it's Function+PrintScreen.

I use Internet Explorer. Your mileage may vary.

-Dunc

Posted by iomoon   ( 1042 ) on Feb-11-07 at 07:11:56 PST   Listings
Good day all.

X is easy in Pinyin Chinese.

X is for Xiaojiuzhan local overprint.
Posted by paperhistory   ( 1971